Monthly Bulletin, July 2022

Media NGOs concerned about Chisinau Court’s decision to sanction administrator of Jurnal TV station

Eight non-governmental media organizations, including the Independent Journalism Centre (IJC), have expressed concern about the July 26 decision of the Chisinau Court to impose a fine on Jurnal TV administrator Val Butnaru for slander.

The contravention proceedings were triggered after a former policeman, who was the subject of a journalistic investigation by the TV station, filed a complaint with the police accusing Jurnal TV of spreading “false and defamatory information about the commission of a crime, thereby damaging his honor, personal dignity, and professional reputation.”

Judge Elena Ungureanu ordered the penalty to be imposed in the form of a prohibition of undertaking positions of responsibility in a media institution for a period of six months.

The signatory organizations consider that the imposed sanctions are excessive and disproportionate, having a negative effect on the exercise of media freedom. They recall that, according to the provisions of the Law on Freedom of Expression, the state guarantees freedom of expression of the media, and journalists benefit from a series of guarantees that provide increased protection against attempts to hinder media activity.
Media NGOs call on the authorities to refrain from abusing legal provisions against freedom of expression of the media.

Media NGOs have condemned the “aggressive and unacceptable” behavior of the members of the People’s Assembly of ATU Gagauzia against journalists

On July 5, journalist Nokta Slava Radulov became the target of insults and other aggressive manifestations by members of the People’s Assembly of the Gagauzia Territorial Administrative Unit (UTAG), forcing him to leave the public meeting of the authority with physical coercion.

In a joint statement, the IJC, the Media Guard Association, the Electronic Press Association, the Independent Press Association, the “Acces-Info” Centre and RISE Moldova condemned these actions, which, according to them, “undermine the freedom of expression of the press” and reminder that both the national legislation and the Gagauzia Regulation state that “the plenary sessions of the People’s Assembly are open”.

The signatories of the declaration said the actions of the person who physically restrained journalist Nokta constitute a violation of the right to bodily integrity of the person, individual freedom, and safety. Intentionally obstructing the work of the media or the journalist, as well as intimidating the media or the journalist for criticism, is an offense under the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova.

They called for the accountability of those who, “defying the principle of transparency in the decision-making process and freedom of the press, resort to violent and inadmissible actions in a democratic society.”

Media NGOs described the attitude of Health Minister Ala Nemerenco towards the press as “inappropriate”

At a press conference on July 12, Health Minister Ala Nemerenco berated the reporter of the SENS media portal, telling he that a question she had been asked was not to the point and that while journalists insist they are part of a SENS (sensible) publication, she would argue the opposite (“The question is not to the point, but you insist you are a sensible publication, I would argue the opposite.”).

In relation to the breach of the legal deadline for providing information, the minister invoked the increased workload that had arisen in relation to the refugee crisis, accusing the newsroom of “putting pressure on the ministry.”

In a joint statement, the Independent Journalism Center, the Association of Environmental Journalists and Environmental Tourism, the Electronic Press Association, the “Acces-Info” Centre and RISE Moldova reiterated that the state guarantees freedom of the press and the right of access to information of media representatives and no dignitary is in a position to decide for the journalist on the appropriateness of documenting subjects of public interest and the existence of “a sense” in filming in public spaces and institutions.

The signatory organizations described such behavior on the part of public office holders as improper, especially for those in the executive branch. They called on the Minister of Health to refrain from any form of expression that harms the professional reputation of the media in the future.

The government has given the green light to the creation of the Coordinating Council for ensuring information security

On July 6, the Government approved the draft decision on the creation of the Coordinating Council for Information Security. According to the document, this is a collective body with consultative and operational powers that will assess the threat level to information security at national level and propose solutions to resolve possible incidents.

The initiative is part of Moldova’s Information Security Strategy for 2019-2024 and aims to “ensure a high level of information and cyber security”.

The Coordinating Council’s work will be focused on four segments: (1) cyber, with the role of identifying and examining security incidents; (2) operational, aimed at identifying news that could affect the country’s information security; (3) media, with the role of assessing factors that could damage the institutional integrity of information media on virtual platforms; (4) civic-private, with several tasks, including presenting cases of human rights violations regarding free access to information resources.

The media panel will be made up of 10 representatives of several state and non-governmental entities, including the president of the Broadcasting Council (BC) or a delegated member, the general director of Teleradio-Moldova, the president of the Parliamentary committee, the advisor for public communication of the Presidency, representatives of the IJC, the Independent Press Association, the Electronic Press Association, the Press Council, the advocacy and public policy community WatchDog.md, the association TRIACTIV.

Among other things, based on the information gathered, the representatives of the media will have to present analyses, assessments, and solutions for the Coordinating Council, provide support to media outlets in obtaining information from public institutions in order to refute false or manipulative news.

The Coordinating Council’s decisions will be forwarded in an advisory capacity to the President of the country, the Parliament, the Government and other authorities or institutions.

BCS MPs’ initiative to increase penalties for libel rejected by Executive as “inappropriate”

On July 22, the Government adopted a decision on the negative opinion on the legislative initiative drafted by a group of MPs from the parliamentary faction of the Bloc of Communists and Socialists (BCS) to increase the number of penalties for insult and slander as inappropriate.

“In view of the need to protect freedom of expression, the promoted trends regarding the possibility that the person can be held liable only under civil law, as well as the approaches of the Council of Europe and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) to decriminalize libel, the proposal to increase the penalty is to be treated with utmost care, substantiated and further examined in the light of the necessity and appropriateness of the proposed changes,” the government opinion states.

“We consider the initiative to be inappropriate,” Justice Minister Sergiu Litvinenco told the Cabinet meeting. Members of the Government supported this position.

Recall that at the end of April, a group of BCS deputies drafted a bill providing for tougher sanctions in case of finding insulting and spreading false and defamatory information, including on social networks.

Draft audiovisual development strategy for 2023-2027 in public debate

On July 22, several representatives of media service providers, industry experts and other market players took part in a public debate about ensuring real pluralism in audiovisual media and promoting a diversity of providers. These imperatives and other objectives are included in the draft strategy for the development of the audiovisual sector for 2023-2027, which was drawn up by the BC.

“What we aim to achieve with this strategy is the diversity of media service providers, audiovisual media services and audiovisual programs within the same audiovisual media service, the presence of the views of the general public in audiovisual media services, especially linear ones, the presence of free, autonomous, economically and editorially independent media service providers and the access of the public to a wide range of views in audiovisual media services on a daily basis”, said BC President Liliana Vitu during the debates.

She also referred to some decisions on the reorganization of the authority, such as the strengthening of monitoring capacities and the establishment of a function that will deal with public policy and analyze the field, including media market trends. Also issues relating to the calculation of local product hours at suppliers, as well as new concepts in legislation such as disinformation, will be addressed in autumn.

Several media executives drew attention to a common problem in broadcasting – competition between local TV stations and those retransmitting content from abroad. N4 representative Valentin Afteni and TV8’s general director Svetlana Buzu addressed this issue. The deputy director of Jurnal TV, Cristina Pohilenco, highlighted some problems related to audience measurement and the situation on the advertising market. Pohilenco believes that the development of the local media market should be encouraged in Moldova so that “money stays in the country, not goes to other countries.”

Teleradio-Moldova Director General Vlad Turcanu said it was important for the BC to be able to carry out its functions so that there is free competition in the market. According to him, there is a reconfiguration of the audiovisual market coming up and it will probably be a complicated period for many players. “There can’t even be competition in the true sense of the word, between the public broadcaster and other broadcasters,” said Vlad Țurcanu, who added, “We are thinking of cooperation with the commercial area because the interest is public.”

Petru Macovei, executive director of the Independent Press Association, called for the introduction of sanctions in cases where there is a lack of transparency about the financing of suppliers. “It is important to do much more work on transparency of funding sources,” Macovei said.

The chairwoman of the parliamentary committee, Liliana Nicolaescu-Onofrei, who was in attendance, said MEPs were open to supporting the field.

Data from the public registers of the PSA will be released free of charge to journalists

Data from state information resources held by the Public Services Agency (PSA) and released in electronic format will be offered to the press free of charge, according to a decision adopted by the Government on July 27. The approved document stipulates that the requested information is to be provided within five days.

“All requests from the media that came through electronic channels, including the electronic address, we will provide them free of charge. (…) I am personally convinced that the work of investigative journalists contributes to promoting the rule of law. It is also a gesture, including from the Government, as an element of support, first of all, for the media representatives”, said PSA Director Mircea Esanu at a press conference after the Executive meeting.

The new tariffs are entered into force on August 1, 2022.

Over the years, the Independent Journalism Centre has conducted several campaigns calling for the abolition of fees for information in public registers requested by the press.

Previously, a bill was registered in Parliament, which provided for granting free access to PSA databases to journalists on condition that the media institution registers as a personal data controller. The bill was not approved and was returned to the Government. The Ministry of Justice now claims to be drafting a new Access to Information Bill.

Meta expands its data verification program in the Republic of Moldova

Meta has announced that it is expanding its third-party data verification program in Moldova, in a partnership with the Stopfals.md platform. The data verification program aims to improve the quality and content distributed on Facebook or Instagram in order to reduce the volume of false information, Stopfals.md reports.

“We are constantly working on identifying ways to combat the spread of misinformation on our platform, and in this regard we understand the value of partnerships with local experts,” according to Sophie Eyears, strategic partnership development manager on news impartiality at Meta.

“The Stopfals.md portal, managed by the Association of Independent Press (API) in Moldova, has extensive experience in debunking falsehoods and misinformation in the media and on social media. Difficult times such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the aggressive invasion of the Russian army in Ukraine have shown how dangerous fake news and conspiracy theories can be,” says Lilia Zaharia, coordinator of the platform.

Stopfals.md is Meta’s second partner in Moldova’s fact-checking program, after AFP (Agence France Presse).

Information on Moldovan TV channels also available in the European Audiovisual Observatory database

 

 

According to a press release of the BC, for the first time, as of July 18, 2022, data on TV channels in Moldova have been included in the Mavise register. The authority states that this was done following discussions between the BC Chairperson, Liliana Vitu, and representatives of the EAO in May.

Mavise is a free-access database of audiovisual services in 41 European countries and Morocco, which allows interactive searches in the registers of European audiovisual regulatory authorities and/or ministries. It provides, where feasible, information on the ultimate owner of the service provider, as well as on the country of jurisdiction of TV channels, on-demand services and video-sharing platforms available in the European Economic Area.

The database is updated regularly, that is, every two months after any changes are recorded in the national registers.

IMAS survey. How citizens perceive the media situation during the Gavrilita Government

Only sixteen percent of respondents to the July Socio-Political Barometer believe that the media situation has improved under the current government. The number of those who think the media situation has worsened is twice as high, at 36 percent. The survey was conducted by the sociological company IMAS on behalf of Public Media, and the data was released on Wednesday July 20.

At the same time, 32 percent think that the situation in the media has not changed and sixteen percent of respondents did not want to answer the question or did not know what to answer.

Negative perceptions were expressed about the transparency of decisions taken by those in power, as 53 percent of respondents said the situation had worsened and fourteen percent said it had improved. Similarly, when asked about the authorities’ communication with citizens, 56 percent of respondents think it has worsened and eleven percent think it has improved.

The survey was conducted between July 6 and July 18 among a sample of 1007 people in twelve administrative-territorial units. The maximum sampling error is ±3.1 percent.

Businessman Ceslav Ciuhrii is the new owner of Radio Noroc and Noroc TV

Businessman Ceslav Ciuhrii has become the owner of Noroc Media, which owns Radio Noroc and music channel Noroc TV, Newsmaker.md reports.

Ceslav Ciuhrii is the president of the National Tennis Federation of Moldova and the president of a foundation that deals with various social projects. Ciuhrii recently launched the real estate project “German Village”. In the past, he was the owner of the Cactus and Mi Piace restaurants in Chisinau, and a few years ago, his company bought the Guguta café in the centre of the capital. He is also known for investing in pharmaceuticals and helping to bring the retail company Kaufland to Moldova.

Previously, Noroc Media was owned by Doinita Topala, the daughter of former liberal municipal councillor Iurie Topala, former director of the railway company. Iurie Topala was detained in mid-January by the Belgian authorities and was to be extradited to the Republic of Moldova.

Future journalists have signed the code of ethics and promise to respect it in their work

Graduates of the Faculty of Journalism and Communication Sciences of the State University of Moldova (USM) and of the Faculty of International Relations, Political Science and Journalism of the Free International University of Moldova (ULIM) have signed the Code of Ethics of Journalists, pledging to adopt a dignified and responsible professional conduct.  The event took place on June 30 and July 1, 2022, during the ceremony of awarding diplomas of graduation, writes Consiliuldepresa.md.

Press Council member Natalia Porubin stressed the importance of respecting the Code and urged young people to consult it whenever they have editorial dilemmas. “Newsrooms need professional, fair and honest journalists, and respecting the rules of ethics will help you become the best in your profession”, said Natalia Porubin.

Currently 142 media institutions and associations have signed the Code of Ethics of Journalists in Moldova on the Press Council website.

Media Legislation

Fines for incitement to violent action on grounds of prejudice come into force

As of July 3, legislative amendments to Act No 301 on the regulation of bias-motivated offenses came into force. In an interview for the Independent Journalism Centre’s Media Azi portal, Irina Corobcenco, who is responsible for monitoring hate speech at the Promo-LEX Association, argues that incitement to violent action on grounds of prejudice, which involves preconceived ideas based on race, color, ethnic origin, etc., is punishable under Article 346 of the Criminal Code by a fine of 500 to 600 conventional units, equivalent to 25,000 to 30,000 lei (EUR 1,250 to 1,500), or by unpaid community service for 180 to 240 hours, or by imprisonment for 1 to 3 years.

Propagation of genocide and crimes against humanity, which is a form of hate speech, will be punishable by a fine in the amount of 25,000 – 50,000 lei (1250- 2500 euro)) or by imprisonment from one to three years for individuals and by a fine in the amount of 100,000 – 250,000 lei (5000 – 12500 euro), with deprivation of the right to exercise a certain activity for a period of one to five years or by liquidation for legal entities.

A new Article 70/1 “Incitement to discrimination” has been added to the Code of Offenses. Intentional actions, public incitement, dissemination of information or other forms of information to the public, including by means of the mass media, in written form, drawing or image, or by means of a computer system, aimed at instigating discrimination on grounds of prejudice will be punished by a fine of 20 to 80 conventional units (1. 000 – 4,000 lei (equivalent to 50 – 200 euro) for individuals and 120 to 210 conventional units (6,000 – 10,500 lei, or 300 – 525 euro) for persons in positions of responsibility.

Media Monitoring

Four TV stations sanctioned for stories related to the Dodon family file

The BC sanctioned four TV stations at its meeting on July 8 for various violations in their coverage of the subject of the case against former President Igor Dodon and his wife Galina Dodon. Exclusiv TV and Accent TV were publicly warned, NTV Moldova was fined 25,000 lei (€1250) and First in Moldova 10,000 lei (€500).

The monitoring of Exclusiv TV and Accent TV channels was carried out following the self-reporting of BC member Ruslan Mihalevschi on several TV channels. NTV Moldova and Primul in Moldova were monitored on the basis of a complaint filed by the WatchDog.md organization.

According to the report, Exclusiv TV violated the provisions on ensuring a clear distinction between facts and opinions. Also, Exclusiv TV news bulletins were taken over from NTV Moldova without this fact being properly marked. Accent TV took footage from other TV channels without mentioning this. At the same time, Accent TV aired a story about prosecutor Petru Iarmaliuc, who is investigating Igor Dodon’s case. Four people have exposed his insufficient experience to investigate such cases, but the prosecutor’s reply is missing from the news.

Another topic examined by the BC members concerned the news about Galina Dodon’s case. According to WatchDog.md, both NTV Moldova and Primul in Moldova aired a similar story on June 13 about Galina Dodon’s summons to the Prosecutor’s Office.

The results of BC monitoring attested that the targeted news on NTV Modova lacked the Prosecutor’s Office’s reply. BC confirmed that exactly the same material was also broadcast by Primul in Moldova, but without a source. Similarly, the news did not present the position of President Maia Sandu, accused by Igor Dodon of involvement in the case.

Thus, the Council sanctioned the two stations for violations of not ensuring impartiality and balance by presenting the main opposing views. Primul in Moldova was also publicly warned for not indicating the source of the material broadcast.

Pro TV Chisinau fined 20,000 lei for advertising violations

The BC has fined the TV station Pro TV Chisinau a total of 20,000 lei (€1,000) for four infringements relating to audiovisual commercial communications. The sanction was imposed at a July 15 meeting.

The results of the monitoring, which was carried out following a complaint by BC member Eugeniu Ribca on June 21 and 22 in the evening hours, showed that the TV station broadcast commercial content in violation of the Audiovisual Media Services Code. Two violations were detected concerning commercial communication for the broker Pelliron, including information and recommendations to traders. “Following the verification of both the broadcasting schedule presented to the BC and the TV program of the television media service Pro TV Chisinau, the information on the broadcasting schedule of the given program Pelliron is not found,” the monitoring report notes.

Two other violations concerned the audiovisual program “Vremea Pro TV”. According to BC specialists, at the beginning of the program there is a mention about product placement, but at the end of the program the announcement is missing.
Thus, Pro TV Chisinau was fined 5,000 lei (€250) for each violation of the requirements of the legislation on advertising, which stipulates that “audiovisual commercial communications are clearly identifiable and distinguishable from editorial content and comply with the provisions of this code and the Regulation on audiovisual content”.

10 TV, sanctioned for deviations from the audiovisual media service structure approved by the BC

The broadcaster was monitored for compliance with the structure of the audiovisual media service on June 21-27 at the suggestion of BC member Orest Dabija.

On July 22, the results of the monitoring were made public and revealed several deviations. According to Victoria Stetcaia, head of the TV monitoring department, “the news and analysis programs were broadcast in continuous repetition, with a news bulletin covering political and social events only from Romania and a meeting of a parliamentary committee with the participation of the Romanian AUR deputy George Simion”.

BC member Aneta Gonta also mentioned the so-called technical rejects broadcast by this channel – when only the channel’s logo appears on the screen for hours.

Thus, the BC members fined the TV channel 10 TV 14.000 lei (700 euro) for deviations from the audiovisual media service structure approved by the authority.

Bravo TV, fined 18.000 lei

At the beginning of April 2022, the BC admitted Bravo TV’s request to suspend its broadcasting license for two months. At the end of the period, the channel was obliged to inform the council about resuming broadcasting. BC experts claim that the notification from Bravo TV about the lack of activity was received after the submission BC member Ruslan Mihalevschi’s self-report.

Legally speaking, the TV station was supposed to resume its activity on June 8, which, according to the BC, did not happen.

Thus, the members of the Council decided to fine Bravo TV 18,000 lei (900 euro) for unjustified interruption of activity for a period of more than ten days during a calendar year and gave it a deadline of 30 days to remove the deficiencies. The sanction was imposed at the hearing on July 29.

BC rejected Rizea’s request to obtain a license for Realitatea TV Moldova

The BC has rejected an application for a broadcasting license from Realitatea-PHG, of which 50 percent is owned by Romanian politician Cristian Rizea, for the Realitatea TV channel to operate in Moldova. The application was also rejected because of the insufficient volume of European works presented in the project.

“So far, I notice from the structure of the audiovisual media service that the article of the Code of Audiovisual Media Services that stipulates that European works must be at least 50% is not respected. So, the structure does not comply with the provisions of the Code, which is why I will personally vote for rejection,” said BC President Liliana Vitu.

In the end, five out of seven members present at the meeting voted for the rejection of the application and two for the suspension of the decision.

According to public data, Realitatea-PHG was established on October 7, 2020. Cristian Rizea and Iulian Ditcov each own 50% of the company, and Veaceslav Belescu is the administrator.

Anticoruptie.md previously wrote about Rizea’s plans to launch a TV station in Chisinau. The portal noted that Rizea’s business partner, businessman Iulian Ditcov, was sentenced in November 2014 to three years and six months in prison in the “Romanian Post” case and was later released on parole. The source notes that Cristian Rizea was a member of the Romanian Social Democratic Party from 2008-2016. He later settled in the Republic of Moldova, shortly before he was finally convicted in Romania for corruption offenses. In a video interview of his own, Rizea dismissed reports of his conviction in Romania.

Recently, Cristian Rizea was forced by the court to deny the false and defamatory information, which harms the honor, dignity, and professional reputation of TV8 journalist Mariana Rata.

BC has banned the distribution of the M-Mulit channel in the Republic of Moldova

On July 22, the BC banned the broadcasting of the TV channel M-Mulit after finding that it does not have a valid broadcasting license. According to the decision, which entered into force on the date of adoption, media service distributors will have to exclude this channel from their retransmitted media service offerings.

The decision was adopted after examination of a monitoring report on M-Mulit. The BC also found that the broadcaster had broadcast local advertising despite claiming to be a foreign channel.

At a July 1 meeting of the BC, the monitoring of M-Mulit (“M-Мульт”) for compliance with the provisions of the Audiovisual Media Services Code was ordered.  The results of the monitoring attested that in the period from July 1-4, the TV media service broadcast commercial communications for several shops, commercial banks and other economic agents.

The BC stated that it had notified M-Mulit’s representative in the Republic of Moldova about the fact that the TV station had broadcast local advertising. Radio Star did not react to the Council’s letter. Later, the position of Premiera TV was received, stating that advertising on M-Mulit is included by Premiera TV based on cooperation contracts with several advertising agencies in the Republic of Moldova.

Following a check by the Board of Directors of the official website of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation, Premiera SL is not among the providers holding a broadcasting licence issued by the competent authority in Spain, and it is noted that M-Mulit is not a foreign TV station.

Representatives of the BC also stated that, before the meeting, they received a notification from Radio Star SRL, informing them that Premiera TV had decided to suspend, as of  July 25, the broadcasting of advertising to the public in Moldova.

The Board members decided that they would come back to the matter to establish which of the legal entities was at fault in this case. BC Chairwoman Liliana Vitu added that she would also refer the matter to the law enforcement bodies regarding the use of forgery.

IJC Updates

Analysis: How five TV stations covered the initiative to reorganize the higher education system

On June 27, Minister of Education and Research Anatolie Topala announced that several universities in Moldova would be merged, undergoing a process of modernization and reorganization of higher education. According to the Minister, the reform would be necessary to manage education resources more efficiently, taking into account that the number of students is constantly decreasing, and a concentration of financial sources would also mean better conditions for students and teachers.

In an analysis published on the IJC Mediacritica portal, journalist Diana Railean looked at how the five most popular TV stations in the country – Prime TV, Moldova 1, Jurnal TV, NTV Moldova and Pro TV Chisinau – covered the subject in their news bulletins.

The journalist concludes that during the monitored period (June 27 – July 8), the subject was widely covered by the five TV channels, but in some cases truncated. Journalists of some media outlets violated the Code of Ethics and the Code of Audiovisual Media Services, thus depriving society of the right to be properly informed on a subject of public interest.

NTV Moldova avoided providing balanced opinions in much of its coverage. Journalists resorted to mixing facts and opinions and lacked the right of reply, including on accusations against the Ministry of Education and Research.

The public TV station Moldova 1, as well as Jurnal TV and Pro TV in general, covered the subject in a balanced way, but some of the material was written from a single source, thus violating the provision of the Code of Ethics of Journalists in the Republic of Moldova, which stipulates that “the journalist must obtain and present the opinion of all parties relevant to the subject”.

Prime TV presented the story in a balanced way, seeking alternative sources when ministry representatives were not to be found by contacting state secretaries, representatives of the parliamentary committee responsible for education, etc.

According to the author, during the period of monitoring the news bulletins on the five TV stations, there was a lack of relevant analysis of the topic of the reorganization of the higher education system. The full story can be read HERE.

The material was produced as part of the project “Fighting propaganda and manipulation through media literacy tools”, implemented by the Independent Journalism Center from November 2021 to November 2022, with the support of the Black Sea Trust, a project of the German Marshall Fund of the United States.

Podcast cuMINTE: The subject of minorities in the Moldovan press

In Moldova and beyond, minorities, whether national, religious, or sexual, frequently encounter stereotypes and stigmatization, and the media does not always fulfil its role as a promoter of human rights, tolerance, and non-discrimination.

These are the conclusions reached by the guests of the July edition of the Podcast cuMINTE, produced by the Independent Journalism Centre of Moldova – civic activist Angelica Frolov, program coordinator at the Genderdoc-M Information Centre, Yan Feldman, president of the Council for the Prevention and Elimination of Discrimination and the Ensuring of Equality (recently also an expert on behalf of the Republic of Moldova in the Advisory Committee of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe) and Vasile Micleusanu, communication expert, founder of the Bang-Bang platform.

According to them, often in the rush for sensations, and sometimes because of lack of information, journalists promote stereotypes and prejudices towards their fellow human beings instead of fighting discrimination and promoting diversity.

One of the worst mistakes the media makes when dealing with this issue is to incite discrimination through hate speech, especially in comments left by internet users. Media platforms are also responsible for moderating comments, which is usually not done. The second mistake would be the lack of information of the journalist himself, insufficient knowledge of the problems faced by minorities. And the third – the media’s dependence on audience, on the number of views and the journalist’s belief that outrageous material will always get more views.

In conclusion, the participants in the show come up with a series of tips for those who feel discriminated against in a media story. They could turn to the Council for the Elimination of Discrimination and the Promotion of Equality, the BC, the Press Council, or simply react with a reply.

The cuMINTE podcast is produced by the IJC with support from the Black Sea Trust, a project of the German Marshall Fund of the United States.

Loading

Share This

Copy Link to Clipboard

Copy